Updated on Tuesday, May 25, 2021
It takes money to make money, or so the saying goes. But if you donâ€™t have money to invest, should you take on debt to try to make more? A recent MagnifyMoney study found that many people have done so.
While investors took on different types of debt and were driven by various motivators, MagnifyMoneyâ€™s survey of more than 2,000 respondents â€” nearly 1,000 of whom were investors â€” found that 40% of investors took on debt to invest, with younger people the most likely to do so.
But this can wade into risky territory, says Ismat Mangla, MagnifyMoney senior director of content.
â€śThereâ€™s always the chance your investments will lose value, making it difficult for you to pay back the principal and interest. So the thing to keep in mind is: Can you afford the risk? Thereâ€™s no one-size-fits-all answer.â€ť
Debt is a four-letter word (yes, both literally and figuratively), but 4 in 10 U.S. investors have taken it on to invest.
The younger generations led the way, with 80% of Gen Zers (ages 18 to 24) and 60% of millennials (ages 25 to 40) reporting that theyâ€™ve taken on debt to invest. Their elders were significantly less likely to do so, with just 28% of Gen Xers (ages 41 to 55) and 9% of baby boomers (ages 56 to 75) reporting the same.
As for what type of debt investors took on, personal loans were the most frequent source at 38%. Another relatively large contingent (23%) reported turning to Mom, Dad, their rich uncle, another family member or a friend for a loan.
Other means of funding investments included:
A mysterious 2% took on â€śotherâ€ť sources of debt.
Gen Z investors were the most likely (29%) to turn to friends or family for a loan, while millennial and Gen X investors were more likely to take out a personal loan â€” 45% and 36%, respectively. Baby boomers were the only group who chose credit card debt over other forms to fund their investments, with 23% reporting doing so.
When trying to figure out whether one type of debt is better to take on than another to fund investments, Mangla cautions against those that come with high interest rates.
â€śIf you are planning to finance your investments with debt, ideally youâ€™d use an option that comes with a fixed low interest rate and that youâ€™re not required to pay back the funds immediately,â€ť she says. â€śYou want to be confident that your investment gains will exceed the costs of your loan. If they donâ€™t, you should be confident that you could take that financial hit.â€ť
Nearly half (46%) of indebted investors have taken on whatâ€™s arguably a pretty big chunk of change for investing â€” $5,000 or more.
The percentage who have taken on less than $1,000 to invest (22%) is almost the same as those who have taken on more than $10,000 in debt to invest (20%).
Gen Xers (41%) and baby boomers (36%) were the most likely to take on $10,000 or more in debt to invest, as just 17% of millennials and 7% of Gen Zers said the same.
Meanwhile, 65% of those who took on investing debt are still paying it off, including 73% of Gen Xers, 67% of millennials, 66% of Gen Zers and 18% of baby boomer investors.
Many people taking on debt to invest have their eye on the future, with more than a third reporting they did to invest in a retirement plan. The stock market is the other major motivator, with buying a particular stock and day trading following closely behind as reasons for taking on debt. One in 10 investors said they took on debt to buy cryptocurrency.
While Gen Zers, millennials and Gen Xers all reported saving for retirement as their biggest motivator for going into debt to invest, 50% of baby boomers said they did to buy a certain stock they wanted.
Letâ€™s say you already have debt, as the vast majority of Americans do. Of the MagnifyMoney survey respondents, about 4 in 10 have non-mortgage debt, including credit card debt, student loans and auto loans, while another 4 in 10 report having no debt at all. Meanwhile, about one-fifth only have mortgage debt.
So, is it a good idea to invest before paying off that debt? In general, respondents were nearly split here, with 49% saying itâ€™s a good move and 51% saying debt should be paid off before you start investing.
Those who are already in debt were much more likely to say consumers should still invest even if theyâ€™re in the red â€” 59% with non-mortgage debt and 50% with only mortgage debt agreed, compared with 37% who are debt-free.
Mangla sides with those who believe in investing even if you already have debt.
Even if you invest a small amount while you are also paying off debt or focusing on other financial priorities, according to Mangla, those investments could still reap you big rewards in the long run. And if you only focus on paying down debt before you start investing, you could miss the chance to take advantage of the benefits of compounding returns from your investments.
â€śRemember that investing early in your life impacts your long-term success when it comes to retirement savings,â€ť she adds.
Interestingly enough, if $10,000 fell out of the sky, 44% said paying off debt is the best step to make, while 35% said splitting it between paying off debt and investing would be the right way to go. Just 15% would straight up invest it.
Final note: Of those who took on debt to invest, 63% said they regret it. But would they do it again? Maybe. Overall, 45% of consumers said they would consider taking on debt to invest. Of those who took on debt to invest, 61% would do it again and 33% would consider it.
MagnifyMoney commissioned Qualtrics to conduct an online survey of 2,046 U.S. consumers â€” of which 994 were investors â€” from March 30 to April 6, 2021. The survey was administered using a non-probability-based sample, and quotas were used to ensure the sample base represented the overall population. All responses were reviewed by researchers for quality control.
We defined generations as the following ages in 2021:
While the survey also included consumers from the silent generation (defined as those 76 and older), the sample size was too small to include findings related to that group in the generational breakdowns.